Moms Justice Top Mass Tort Lawsuits in June 2023; Camp Lejeune, Talc, and Toxic Baby Formula.

Johnson & Johnson, the multinational medical and pharmaceutical giant, announced this week that it would pay $8.9 billion offer to settle approximately 60,000 claimants for its talc-related lawsuits. The claimants had alleged that the talc present in the company's iconic Baby Powder and other products caused cancer. If approved, this massive settlement could end one of the largest and most high-profile product liability cases in recent history.

Over the years, Johnson & Johnson has faced a barrage of lawsuits, with plaintiffs claiming that the talc found in its Baby Powder and other products caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer linked to asbestos exposure. The company has always maintained that its products were safe and asbestos-free. Still, the lawsuits have continued to pile up, leading to a costly legal battle and significant damage to the company's reputation.

The company's offer to settle these talc-related lawsuits came after a series of negotiations and mediation efforts aimed at resolving the issue. With 16,700 claimants backing the offer, Johnson & Johnson appears to be taking a major step forward in putting an end to the ongoing legal disputes surrounding its talc products. The settlement amount would be one of the largest in the history of product liability cases, marking a significant milestone in this long-running saga.

For the thousands of claimants who have alleged that the talc in Johnson & Johnson's products caused their cancer, the settlement offer represents an opportunity to receive compensation and, for many, a sense of justice. If the settlement is approved, it will bring closure to a long and emotionally draining legal battle. However, it is important to note that the settlement does not constitute an admission of guilt by Johnson & Johnson; the company continues to maintain that its talc products are safe and asbestos-free.

Johnson & Johnson's $8.9 billion settlement offer for its talc-related lawsuits has gained the support of thousands of claimants, marking a significant step towards resolving one of the largest product liability cases in recent history. The settlement, if approved, would bring closure to thousands of individuals who have been seeking justice for years and allow the company to focus on rebuilding its brand and reputation. While the settlement does not represent an admission of guilt, it highlights the importance of corporate responsibility and consumer safety in today's litigious landscape.

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune is the site of one of the worst water contamination cases in US history. The base was a frequent pollution spot where oil, wastewater, and toxic chemicals used as degreasers and solvents were all knowingly dumped in the local storm drains between 1952 and 1987, contaminating the local water supply for 35 years.

A Brief History of Camp Lejeune

Camp Lejeune, located in North Carolina, is the largest Marine Corps base on the United States East Coast. For decades, the site has been a bedrock of American military power, home to thousands of service members and their families. But beneath the surface of this proud institution, a toxic secret has been brewing.

Between the 1950s and 1980s, people living or working at the base were unknowingly exposed to contaminated drinking water. The water was tainted with harmful chemicals at concentrations up to 240 to 3400 times higher than permitted safety levels. The contaminants included volatile organic compounds (VOCs) like trichloroethylene (TCE), tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and benzene. Prolonged exposure to these chemicals has been linked to numerous health issues, including several types of cancers and birth defects.

The suffering and health challenges faced by those exposed to the contaminated water have been heartbreaking. For years, affected veterans and their families fought for recognition and compensation. However, legal roadblocks and government inaction stood in their way, denying them the justice they deserved.

The Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2021

In June 2022, after tireless advocacy from affected families, veterans' groups, and concerned citizens, the U.S. government passed the Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2021. This Act was part of a broader legislative effort, the Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act.

The Honoring, Our PACT Act, was designed to address issues affecting veterans who were exposed to toxic materials during their service. It represents a significant commitment from our government to protect the health and welfare of those who served our country.

The Camp Lejeune Justice Act, a crucial part of this larger legislative package, specifically provides a path to compensation for victims of toxic water exposure at Camp Lejeune. This Act is a beacon of hope for affected individuals who have been denied justice for so long.

Seeking Compensation: The Camp Lejeune Lawsuit

With the passing of the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, veterans and their families who were exposed to the contaminated water can now seek compensation by filing a lawsuit. This development represents a significant step towards justice for the thousands of victims who suffered due to the contamination.

The lawsuit process, while a critical path to justice, can be complex and daunting. It involves demonstrating exposure to the contaminated water and establishing a direct link between the exposure and specific health conditions. Given the complexity of this process, it's essential for affected individuals to seek guidance from attorneys specializing in environmental law or veteran affairs.

The Camp Lejeune Toxic Water Exposure Lawsuit is more than just a legal battle. It's a fight for recognition, justice, and compensation for years of suffering endured by our veterans.

Cow’s milk-based baby formula and milk fortifier products (like Enfamil™ and Similac®) are more likely to develop necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). This serious, potentially fatal gastrointestinal illness is seen mostly in premature babies and low-birth-weight babies.

Studies have found that premature babies develop NEC and other problems at higher rates when fed formula made with cow’s milk compared to preemies who consume breast milk.

Separately, Abbott Nutrition announced a voluntary recall of its Similac, Similac PM 60/40, Alimentum, and EleCare powdered infant formulas in February 2022 following reports of bacterial infections and other potentially deadly complications.

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), the most common gastrointestinal emergency in premature infants, occurs when the wall of the intestine is invaded by bacteria, leading to infection and inflammation that can ultimately destroy the wall of the bowels. This condition's predisposing factors are prematurity, formula feeding, and sepsis.

The infection that develops as a result of NEC often requires surgery that can lead to further gastrointestinal diagnoses or injuries.

Can Baby Formula Cause NEC?

While not all baby formula products carry a risk of digestive disease, some cow milk-based products made by  Enfamil™ and Similac® do pose a risk to a child’s health. If you have any of the following products in your home, you should dispose of them and find a safer alternative for your child:

• Similac Special Care 20
• Similac NeoSure
• Similac Special Care 24
• Similac Special Care 30
• Similac Special Care 24 - High Protein
• Similac Liquid Protein Fortifier
• Enfamil Human Milk Fortifier
• Enfamil NeuroPro EnfaCare
• Enfamil 24 Cal

Who Can File a Baby Formula Lawsuit?

You may be able to file an NEC baby formula lawsuit if your child was:

• Born prematurely
• Fed cow’s milk-based formula or milk fortifier
• Diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), suffered from the severe stomach or intestinal problems, or needed to have surgery to help the problems

Even if this happened years ago, you may still have a case. If your child suffered and it could have been prevented, you have rights.

If you’re eligible, our experienced baby formula lawyers can help you navigate the legal process at no out-of-pocket costs to you and your family.

Disclaimer: Some information on this site may be considered attorney advertising under your state’s laws and ethical rules. This legal news site and its content are for general information and are not legal advice. Information on this site may be incomplete or out-of-date.

No attorney-client relationship is created between you and any attorney who publishes content or online forms on this site. Hiring a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements.